Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺

😢 #neverforget #neverforgive #justice ✴️✳️✴️✳️✴️✳️         Support for Reiner/ Υποστήριξη για τον Reiner/Die Möglichkeit, Reiner zu unterstützen findest du 👉HIER: https://icic.law/ @icic_law_official @icic_law_news @ReinerFuellmich @ReinerFuellmichEnglish @ICICommittee22 @ICICommittee    www.icic.law

A new statement from Dr. Reiner Füllmich on current world events, the situation in the prison and the prospects for a positive future ...💥🔥📣💬📬❤️ #freeReiner ✴️✳️✴️✳️✴️✳️ Support for Reiner/ Υποστήριξη για τον Reiner/ You can find the possibility to support Reiner 👉HERE: https://icic.law/ @icic_law_official @icic_law_news @ReinerFuellmich @ReinerFuellmichEnglish @ICICommittee22 @ICICommittee www.icic.law

Durov still does not get it — Strategic Culture https://t.me/strategic_culture/3972 https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/09/10/durov-still-does-not-get-it/ Stephen Karganovic Durov’s recent statements which indicate that he is labouring under grave illusions about the nature of his predicament. (...) Pavel Durov should stop wasting his time attempting to lecture his French captors on the wrongfulness of the persecution to which they are subjecting him. They are completely uninterested in the philosophical and legal principles to which Durov is referring. Like their transatlantic colleagues, who display juridical virtuosity by indicting ham sandwiches, with equal facility and with as little professional remorse French prosecutors are prepared to indict bœuf bourguignon, if that is what the system they serve demands of them. Far more than a legal strategy, Durov now needs an effective negotiating position (and perhaps also a crash course in poker) to preserve the integrity of his enterprise and to regain fully his freedom without sacrificing honour. For an excellent introduction to the Western rules based order, Durov need look no further than the woeful predicament of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, the German-American lawyer who for months has been languishing in a German prison after being targeted on trumped-up charges for exposing the fraud of the recent “health emergency” that we all vividly recall. Properly understood, the Durov affair should come as a sobering lesson not only for its principal but more importantly for the edification of the frivolous Russian intelligentsia who still entertain adolescent illusions about where the grass is greener and continue to nourish a petulant disdain for their own country, its way of life, and culture. -- dazu https://t.me/EmDeEllMedia/19931 The Resurrection of Nazi Germany | https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/09/04/the-resurrection-of-nazi-germany/ The 21st century version is worse than the 20th century version. (...) During the years of the Covid hoax, Dr. Fuellmich organized a committee to investigate the lies about Covid and the “vaccine,” and was preparing to bring a lawsuit in behalf of those whose health and lives were lost to the “vaccine” that authorities said was “safe and effective.” This was going too far, and the ruling establishment took steps to stop him. Possibly Washington was a participant in the plot against him. Dr. Fuellmich, who lives in Germany and in California, on his way to his California home was prevented from entering the US, and had to go to Mexico while waiting to sort out whatever the difficulty was. In Mexico he and his wife were tricked by the German embassy into going to the airport to have their passports renewed. The German government illegally kidnapped Dr. Fuellmich and flew him to Germany where he was arrested and since has spent much time in solitary confinement, which is used for the purpose of wearing down a victim’s will to resist. All of this was done in violation of the German constitution and German law. His pre-trial detention is now double the length of pre-trial detention permitted under German law. (...) During the long proceedings against Dr. Fuellmich, the judge has refused Dr. Fuellmich’s right to confront the “witnesses” against him with cross examination or even to allow them on the stand. The judge has refused the defense’s use of the evidence in its possession and has protected the fake evidence against Fuellmich from examination. Evidence is beside the point. The point is conviction of Dr. Fuellmich “at all costs.” When the original charge fell apart despite the judge blocking evidence of innocence, the judge concocted a new charge, one completely nonsensical and said that he intended Dr. Fuellmich’s conviction. (...) The purpose of the false proceedings against Dr. Fuellmich is to teach all others not to interfere with the agendas of the ruling elites. -- The Persecution of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich https://kirschsubstack.com/cp/148480587

A new statement by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, together with thanks for the sympathy of all friends, supporters and companions in difficult times.❤️🕯💬📬

Without truth there can be no justice and without justice there can be no peace.”

#freeReiner #nevergiveup #justice By special request from Reiner 👇🎶 https://youtu.be/cmpRLQZkTb8?feature=shared ✴️✳️✴️✳️✴️✳️           Support for Reiner/ Υποστήριξη για τον Reiner/Die Möglichkeit, Reiner zu unterstützen findest du 👉HIER: https://icic.law/ @icic_law_official @icic_law_news @ReinerFuellmich @ReinerFuellmichEnglish @ICICommittee22 @ICICommittee     www.icic.law

Part 4 The verdict has already been reached At around 2.30 p.m., the revised motions for evidence were finally submitted to the court. After about 10 minutes, it was announced that the motions for the examination of the witnesses present would be decided in the judgment, which means that they were again rejected. The statement according to 257 StPO on the witness examination of Roger Bittel, which took place last week, was made by attorney Wörmer and Reiner Füllmich. Attorney Wörmer filed a motion for recusal against the entire chamber because the presiding judge said in between that there was no need to get upset that the witnesses were not heard or that the motions for evidence were not granted; after all, the legal opinion of the chamber would be known and the defendant would be free with the defense to appeal to the BGH and have the verdict reviewed, or, with regard to the refusal to revoke the arrest warrant, to the OLG Braunschweig. This alone leads to the conclusion that the chamber has already passed the verdict and is clearly biased against the accused and has already mentally convicted him. The deadline for submitting reasons for Wörmer's application for bias against the chamber was 11.00 a.m. on Monday. The presiding judge then formally closed the taking of evidence. Attorney Wörmer announced another present witness for the next day of the hearing on September 20, 2024. The presiding judge saw no problem with this, in which case the taking of evidence could be reopened. He asked StA Recha and adhesion plaintiff's representative attorney Frank Großenbach (Antonia Fischer was absent) about the pleadings, whereupon both confirmed that they remained unchanged. The presiding judge invited the defense to plead. Attorney Wörmer stated that there were still additions to be made and that the taking of evidence would be reopened at the next hearing. The hearing was closed at around 3.00 p.m. and will continue on Friday, 20.09.2024 at 9.15 a.m. Pictured in the photos: Attorney Katja Wörmer Attorney Dr. Christof Miseré Dr. Reiner Füllmich from K. Heusinger @wearegreeekja

Part 3 Hearing The defense responded in a counterstatement and replied that the prosecution had so far refrained from clarifying the case and that it was rather the court that was delaying the proceedings due to its procedural methods. Moreover, the maxim of the trial was not to be completed particularly quickly. Against the background of the time aspect that the client is in pre-trial detention, the trial maxim cannot be to finish particularly quickly in order to keep the pre-trial detention as short as possible and the criminal detention as long as possible, since the prosecution had already applied for a prison sentence of 3 years and 9 months and for the arrest warrant to be upheld. This means that the defendant would not be released, not even when the verdict is announced. The maxim of the trial could only ever be the thorough clarification of the facts of the case. The defendant has a right to this. In this case, this is being trampled underfoot by the public prosecutor's office and the court with the current procedure. Today's trial day lasted six hours, during which the four witnesses present could have simply been questioned instead of reading the motions for evidence themselves and then rejecting them. By summoning witnesses, the defense does not delay anything at all: the witness statements are not redundant, i.e. they are not repeated, but it is precisely about the questioning of witnesses, including Viviane Fischer, after the legal notice of 3.5.24 by the court and after the resulting changed assessment of it. Therefore, in order to clarify the facts, it would have been absolutely necessary to hear the witnesses present and also to hear Viviane Fischer again on the changed basis of the court. @wearegreeekja

Part 2 Everything is to be rejected The witnesses present were: Viviane Fischer, her lawyer in the present proceedings Gert-Holger Willanzheimer, Andrea Henning and Nicole Wolf. Attorney Katja Wörmer had previously sent the motions for evidence to the court and had the witnesses summoned in due form by the bailiff. As mentioned above, the motions for evidence were rejected by the chamber in the morning after 1 1/2 hours of deliberation. The defendant had also submitted handwritten motions for evidence. The defendant's handwritten revised motions for evidence were not legible, so attorney Wörmer had to write them down in a readable version by dictation from Reiner Füllmich. This email did not go through after half an hour, neither to the presiding judge nor to the clerk, whereupon the presiding judge had the content of the email burned onto a CD. StA Recha was conspicuous for his clearly disgruntled counter-statements to the defense. He expressed his opinion that the defense intended to delay the proceedings. He also insinuated that the defense was not interested in the case, but only in delaying the trial. He went on to say that the motions for evidence were not such motions and that they should all be rejected. @wearegreeekja

Part 2 Everything is to be rejected The witnesses present were: Viviane Fischer, her lawyer in the present proceedings Gert-Holger Willanzheimer, Andrea Henning and Nicole Wolf. Attorney Katja Wörmer had previously sent the motions for evidence to the court and had the witnesses summoned in due form by the bailiff. As mentioned above, the motions for evidence were rejected by the chamber in the morning after 1 1/2 hours of deliberation. The defendant had also submitted handwritten motions for evidence. The defendant's handwritten revised motions for evidence were not legible, so attorney Wörmer had to write them down in a readable version by dictation from Reiner Füllmich. This email did not go through after half an hour, neither to the presiding judge nor to the clerk, whereupon the presiding judge had the content of the email burned onto a CD. StA Recha was conspicuous for his clearly disgruntled counter-statements to the defense. He expressed his opinion that the defense intended to delay the proceedings. He also insinuated that the defense was not interested in the case, but only in delaying the trial. He went on to say that the motions for evidence were not such motions and that they should all be rejected. @wearegreeekja