[BASED REBOOT] - 🍎 🔄

Chat is this real

Pissing is a scam invented in 1892 by a jewish-"american" doctor, businessman, and con artist by the name of Sir Duke Walter Bottelberg. Sir Duke Walter Bottelberg inherited a water business from his father, Cumbel Bottelberg, in 1876. This business was small, but essential to their local city of Flint, M*chigan. Walter Bottelberg worked to increase water sales in numerous ways over the years, by way of mixing in addictive substances, adding chemicals, and by inventing portable containers of water, coined "water bottels" (now called water bottles). Despite these measures, water sales stayed low, simply because humans at that point in history did not drink much water. In 1889, Sir Duke Walter Bottelberg made the discovery that by removing a person's foreskin, that person would be unable to prevent himself from pissing, and would piss multiple times a day. This level of pissing is unusual and unhealthy for adult men and women, and causes rapid dehydration, of the body, meaning that circumcised individuals would have to consume many multitudes of extra water a day just so they wouldn't die. In addition to this, the foreskin free piss was clear, rather than the usual dark brown color of healthy piss. This is a sign of severe water loss, which is a fatal condition. 3 years later, in 1892, Sir Duke Walter Bottelberg presented this information to the Elders of Zion, and proposed that all goyim were to be circumcised at birth to promote water sales. After heavy and lengthy debate, the Elders of Zion agreed to implement Walter Bottelbergs plan, in exchange for a cut of his profits. Thus, in 1892, the Universal Circumcision act of 1892 was passed, mandating that all men be circumcised at birth, and any uncircumcised males born after that date are to be stoned to death. This has all been covered up by the media and the government, of course.

Hoping it wasn't posted by @solidshitsnake

The Siege of Cawnpore (Kanpur) during the Indian Rebellion of 1857 became infamous for the brutal massacre of British civilians. Here's a detailed account of the atrocities that took place and how many were killed: The Siege and Its Background In June 1857, Cawnpore (modern-day Kanpur) was an important British garrison in northern India. When the rebellion broke out, about 1,000 British men, women, and children sought refuge in a makeshift entrenchment after the local Indian forces, led by Nana Sahib, the adopted son of the former Maratha Peshwa, joined the uprising. Nana Sahib initially posed as a supporter of the British but soon assumed leadership of the rebels. The British, severely outnumbered and lacking proper fortifications, endured a brutal siege that lasted over three weeks under harsh conditions, with little food or water. First Massacre: Surrender and Betrayal On June 25, 1857, after weeks of intense fighting, Nana Sahib offered the besieged British safe passage to Allahabad in exchange for their surrender. The British, desperate and weakened, accepted the terms. However, as they attempted to board boats on the Ganges River to leave, the rebels betrayed them. As the British men, women, and children were getting onto the boats, the rebels opened fire on them. Most of the British men were killed immediately. Many women and children were either dragged back ashore or drowned in the river as the boats were set on fire. Around 120 British women and children who survived the initial massacre were taken prisoner and held in a building known as the Bibighar. Second Massacre: The Bibighar Massacre After the British relief forces approached Cawnpore, Nana Sahib's advisers decided to execute the remaining prisoners. On July 15, 1857, orders were given for the massacre of the women and children held at Bibighar. Indian soldiers were initially reluctant to carry out the executions, so local butchers (menial workers) were called in to hack the victims to death with meat cleavers and swords. Approximately 120 British women and children were brutally murdered. The bodies were later thrown into a nearby well, which became a symbol of British outrage over the massacre.